As our nation confronts increasingly divisive times, teachers may find that tackling controversial topics in the classroom is more difficult than ever. How can sensitive issues such as immigration, racial discrimination, politics and government, and police behavior be debated in a civil manner? How can critical thinking skills be incorporated in these discussions? Current events can be seen as teaching opportunities to engage students and to model civil debate and discussion. Helping students learn how to discuss current local, state, national and international issues using facts and reason to support their arguments is critical to their development as responsible and informed citizens.
Our civics education resources provide a foundational knowledge for students to use in engaging in discussions about controversial topics. The Civics Renewal Network offers a range of resources to support teachers in the classroom. We will continue to add resources to this page, so check back and see what’s new!
From Provocative to Productive: Teaching Controversial Topics
Get first steps for creating a respectful yet vibrant environment for students to explore diverse ideas on controversial topics, from politics to profanity, religion to racism. Four guidelines and a debate leader checklist provide a foundation for those seeking to steer productive conversations about controversial subjects.
Choose the News
This unit guides students as they explore how the news is chosen, becoming more informed and critical news consumers as they deepen their understanding of the process by which the free press operates.
Believe It or Not
This unit introduces students to the purpose and practice of media literacy. It includes pre- and post-visit activities designed to bracket the Believe It or Not? ED Class (The activities also can be done independently of a visit to the Newseum.) Students will come to understand why not all information is trustworthy and how to differentiate the good from the bad. They practice using a set of tools – the consumer’s questions – to deconstruct and evaluate information sources.
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION CHICAGO
A Civil Conversation
Our pluralistic democracy is based on a set of common principles such as justice, equality, liberty. These principles are often interpreted quite differently in specific situations by individuals. This civil conversation activity offers an alternative. In this structured discussion method, under the guidance of a facilitator, participants are encouraged to engage intellectually with challenging materials, gain insight about their own point of view and strive for a shared understanding of issues.
Civil Conversation on the 14th Amendment
The Fourteenth Amendment fundamentally redefined the central institutions of American civic and political life after the Civil War and remains the bulwark of our Constitutional rights today. Use the Civil Conversation strategy to take a closer reading of Section 1 of the Amendment.
Civil Conversation on the Gettysburg Address
On November 19, 1863, President Abraham Lincoln dedicated the cemetery at Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. His brief remarks there became known as the Gettysburg Address, one of the greatest statements about self-government in American history. In this structured discussion, participants are encouraged to engage intellectually with challenging materials, gain insight about their own point of view and strive for a shared understanding of issues.
I Have a Dream: A Civil Conversation
Understanding the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution is important because it sets out the purposes or functions of government as envisioned by the framers. This lesson opens with a group activity in which students look at the words in the Preamble and translate them into everyday language. Then students take part in a civil conversation on Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech. Through discussion of the speech, students will delve more deeply into the meaning of the Preamble.
A Matter of Life and Death: Should Illinois Allow Physician-Assisted Suicide?
Death is an unavoidable part of life—people have no choice about whether they will die. But debate rages about how much control people—especially terminally ill patients suffering considerable pain—should have over the time and manner in which they die. In this unit, students explore arguments on both sides of the assisted suicide debate.
This teaching module includes Deliberation Procedures: A Guide to Deliberation in the Classroom; Topics and Deliberation Questions; and Handouts 1-3. A brief lesson plan called 3D’s: Debate, Discussion and Deliberation outlines an activity using a simple visual chart to explain the differences between debate, discussion and deliberation. This resource is a joint initiative of Street Law, the Constitutional Rights Foundation and the Constitutional Rights Foundation Chicago.
Should Our State Require Photo ID for In-Person Voting?
The right to vote is a fundamental right, protected by the U.S. Constitution. But there are limits to this right, and states can establish reasonable restrictions on time, place, and manner of voting. This deliberation lesson sets up the question of whether states should require a photo ID to vote at the polls.
Position Papers: Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt
Two position papers address the question in the 2016 Supreme Court case Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt: Is a Texas law imposing certain requirements on abortion clinics unconstitutional?
Texas v. Johnson: Should American be allowed to burn the flag?
This case summary provides teachers with everything they need to teach about Texas v. Johnson (1989). It contains background information in the form of summaries and important vocabulary at three different reading levels, as well a review of relevant legal concepts, diagram of how the case moved through the court system, and summary of the decision. This resource also includes six classroom-ready activities that teach about the case using interactive methods.
Gonzales v. Raich
Do federal drug laws exceed the Commerce Clause when applied to intrastate possession of medical marijuana, authorized by state law?
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION
Civil Conversation: Immigration Enforcement Raids
Controversial legal and policy issues, as they are discussed in the public arena, often lead to polarization, not understanding. This Civil Conversation activity offers an alternative. In this structured discussion method, under the guidance of a facilitator, participants are encouraged to engage intellectually with challenging materials, gain insight about their own point of view, and strive for a shared understanding of issues. This lesson plan addresses the debate over the policies of the federal agency – Immigration and Customs Enforcement – that investigates and enforces the nation’s immigration laws.
The Challenge of School Violence
Regardless of fluctuations in its rates, incidence, and categories, violence continues to create an ongoing challenge to the nation’s educational environment. This lesson examines school violence and policy proposals related to it. In a class simulation activity, students acting as school board members, evaluate school safety proposals.